There’s some debate as to whether financial literacy for the extremely poor provides value. I argue that it indeed does, not only in the present, but in the long term, both in improving financial conditions and in breaking the repetitive cycle of poverty. The argument against financial literacy for the extremely poor is that it doesn’t provide value, that it is insufficient to meet the needs of society’s most impoverished. The argument is that financial literacy is for the middle and upper classes, those with financial resources to manage and grow. Let’s look at what is right and not-so-right with this argument. The Argument Against Financial Literacy for the Poor Financial literacy from its roots has aimed for inclusivity. A primary objective of the financial literacy movement is to reduce the socioeconomic gap, which, naturally, is geared toward improving the financial conditions of the poor. You could reduce the socioeconomic gap by reducing the wealth of the middle and upper cl
... one of the largest curated content blog on the internet about personal finance and other financal-related matters.